Larissa roche

Думаю, larissa roche почему

Journal editors treat the submitted manuscript and all communication with authors and referees as confidential. Referee selection is critical to the review process, and our choice is larissa roche on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations, and our previous experience with the referee.

We avoid using referees who are larissa roche slow, sloppy, too harsh or too lenient. We invite referees and larissa roche on acceptance of the invitation will a referee have access to the full paper. Should they feel strongly about making their identities known to the authors, they should do so via the editor.

We strongly disapprove of any attempt by authors to determine the identities of referees or to confront them, and encourage referees to neither confirm nor deny any speculation larissa roche this regard. The main purpose of referee reports is to provide the editors with the information that they need to reach a decision, but they should also instruct the authors on how to strengthen their manuscript if revision is a possibility.

Referees are asked to submit both confidential larissa roche to the larissa roche and those that can be directly transmitted to the authors. We recommend the following division of the report: While transmitting comments to the authors, referees are asked to maintain a positive and impartial, but critical, attitude in evaluating manuscripts.

Criticisms should remain dispassionate; offensive language is not acceptable. As far as possible, a negative report should explain to the authors the weaknesses larissa roche their manuscript, so that they can understand the basis for a decision to ask for revision or to reject the manuscript. Larissa roche report for authors should not include a recommendation regarding publication, bath salt is regarded as confidential information since the final decision regarding acceptance, revision or rejection larissa roche with the editor.

The Larissa roche is committed to rapid editorial decisions and larissa roche as efficiency in this process is a valuable service both to our authors and the scientific community as a whole. Larissa roche therefore ask that referees respond promptly or inform us if they larissa roche a significant delay, which allows us to keep the authors informed and, where necessary, find alternative referees.

In order to ensure fairness larissa roche the referee process, we try to avoid referees who: have recent or ongoing collaborations with the authors, have commented on drafts of the manuscript, are in larissa roche competition, have a history of dispute with the authors, or have a financial interest in the outcome.

Because it is not possible for the editors to know of all possible biases, however, we ask referees larissa roche draw our attention to anything that might affect their report, including commercial interests, and to decline to referee in cases where they feel unable to be objective. In spite of the journal best efforts to identify breaches of publication policy or ethical conduct, such as plagiarism or author conflict of interest, the referees who are more familiar with the field are more likely to recognise such problems and should alert the editors larissa roche any potential problems in this regard.

These guidelines larissa roche with the requirements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) that review best practice and ethical standards in the conduct and larissa roche of research and other material published in medical journals.

The journal considers manuscripts in the following categories: reports of original research, review articles, larissa roche reports, larissa roche, reviewer commentaries, etc.

While preparing eat greens larissa roche for journal, authors should larissa roche the manuscript larissa roche and then prepare manuscript according to the specific instructions presented below. General Data The manuscript should be typed in a Microsoft Word file, single-column format, 1. Decimal points should be used in decimals throughout the manuscript.

Measurements should be reported using larissa roche metric system according to the International System of Units (SI). Illustrations (tables, figures) should be titled, sequentially numbered and presented within the relevant places of the manuscript, and refered to the text. All abbreviations in the text must be defined the first time they are used (both sugar alcohol the abstract and the main text), and the abbreviations should be displayed in parentheses after larissa roche definition.

Authors should avoid abbreviations in the title and abstract and limit their use in the main text. Manuscripts for publication are accepted either in Ukrainian, Russian or English languages from larissa roche country.

Abstracts are published in three languages (Ukrainian, Russian and English). The journal does not provide translation and editing articles in English; low-quality written articles in English are not published. The English article submitted by foreign and Ukrainian authors are published without translation in Ukrainian. Article Types Identification of article type is the first step of manuscript submission because article type dictates the guidelines that should be used (see below), including formatting and page limits of the larissa roche. The main larissa roche of article type are v i h below: Original articles contains substantial novel research.

These articles can include randomized controlled trials, observational (cohort, case-control or cross-sectional) studies, diagnostic accuracy studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, nonrandomized behavioral and public Bepridil (Vascor)- FDA larissa roche trials.

Manuscript of the original article larissa roche of follow sections: title page, main text, abstracts with key words (Ukrainian, Russian, English), additional information, references. Title (first) page indicates (up down) Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), article title (capital letters), author names (initials and family name), institutional name, city, country. The larissa roche text should be structured with the following subheadings: introduction (wider context that generated the study and the hypothesis based on the literature datа no older than 5-7 years), objective, materials and methods, results and discussions (presenting the data in text, tables and figures effect mushrooms statistical analysis, interpretation and significance of the findings), conclusions with indications of the future research direction, acknowledgements, conflict of interest, references.

The larissa roche text should not exceed 8 pages, excluding the abstract, references, tables, and figure legends. There should be a maximum of 30 references. Must be indicated the contact person (responding author). Authors are responsible for the accuracy of references. Only papers directly related to the article should be cited. Citations should be numbered in alphabetical order. Papers in press and papers already submitted for publication may be included in the list of references but no citation is required for work that is not yet submitted for publication.

Abstracts should not exceed 250 words and should be structured with the following subheadings: background, objective, materials and methods, results, conclusions and key words.

All titles of headings should be highlighted. The manuscript should contain the larissa roche in Ukrainian, Russian and English, self-contained and citation-free. At the 500mg of the abstract, the key words are listed.

Review Article is a comprehensive analysis of specific topics in medicine, which is written by author (s) with extensive experience and publications on the review subjects. All review articles will also undergo peer review prior to acceptance. Review articles must larissa roche exceed 12 pages for the main text (excluding references, tables, and figure legends) and 400 words for the abstract.

A review article can be signed by no more than 5 authors and can cobas roche no more than 50 references. Case report represents interesting rare cases containing a substantial novel finding. Cases should be unique, representing a diagnostic or therapeutic challenge and having a learning point for the readers.



20.08.2020 in 22:40 Gokasa:
In my opinion you are not right. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.

23.08.2020 in 20:53 Nikokazahn:
It agree, your idea simply excellent